THURSDAY, March 17 (HealthDay News) -- Cutting-edge gene therapy
on Parkinson's disease patients significantly improved the tremors,
rigidity and other motor skill problems that are hallmarks of the
illness, a small new study reports.
The phase 2 study enrolled 45 patients with moderate to advanced
Parkinson's disease, with half randomly assigned to receive the
gene therapy and half assigned to undergo a "sham" surgery, a mock
procedure designed to mimic the experimental approach.
Of the 22 patients who were infused directly into the brain with
the glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) gene -- which prompts the
production of a chemical known as GABA that improves motor control
-- half experienced "clinically meaningful improvements" of their
symptoms within six months of surgery, the study authors said.
Although several open-label trials on gene therapy have shown
promise in treating neurologic disease, the researchers noted that
this is the first of its type to be confirmed in a follow-up
randomized double-blind trial, a study in which neither the
investigators nor the patients knew which patients were receiving
the real or sham treatment.
"It's a completely novel therapy -- unlike anything that's currently offered," said co-investigator Dr. Andrew Feigin, an associate investigator at the Center for Neurosciences at Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Manhasset, N.Y.
"I think we expected to see this effect, but you never know," Feigin added. "I was gratified."
The study is published online March 17 in
The Lancet Neurology.
Parkinson's disease affects about one million Americans, most of
them over age 50, and is the second most common neurodegenerative
disease after Alzheimer's, according to the National Parkinson
Foundation.
In addition to confirming results of earlier clinical trials,
the treatment didn't have any serious adverse effects on the
participants, who ranged in age from 30 to 75, according to the
study. The most common mild side-effects related to the treatment
were headache (affecting seven of the patients in the infusion
group versus two in the sham group) and nausea (six versus
two).
Phase 3 trials must be conducted before the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration decides whether to approve the treatment for general
use.
The therapy, which was done with local anesthesia, used a
harmless, inactive virus to deliver the GAD gene into each
patient's subthalamic nucleus, a key brain region involving motor
function. The gene instructs cells to begin making GABA
neurotransmitters to re-establish the normal chemical balance that
becomes dysfunctional as the disease progresses.
At the six-month mark, patients in the gene therapy group who
had been off their medications for 12 hours showed an average 23.1
percent improvement on a scale used to assess motor function in
Parkinson's patients, while placebo patients had a 12.7 percent
improvement.
"For the first time, we're one step closer to a gene therapy for any neurological disease, because we passed this hurdle," said study co-author Dr. Michael Kaplitt, vice chairman for research in the department of neurological surgery at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York City.
"I think we're closer than we've ever been to be able to realistically tell patients . . . they can get this done," said Kaplitt, also a co-founder of Neurologix Inc., the Fort Lee, N.J. company that is developing the GAD therapy and that funded the current study. (Several other researchers also have financial ties to Neurologix and/or a patent related to the GAD product.)
Another surgical procedure, known as deep brain stimulation,
which permanently implants a nerve control device in the brain, has
helped control Parkinson's symptoms in thousands of patients over
the last decade. Deep brain stimulation is apparently associated
with twice the rate of clinical improvement as the gene therapy,
according to background information in the study.
Kaplitt and Feigin said it would be difficult to compare the
highly effective deep brain stimulation to gene therapy just yet,
but that each procedure offers different benefits.
"In practice . . . there are lots of factors," Feigin said, noting that costs for both may be similar. "Some patients might not want hardware in their brain, or others want tried and true methods. Some want state-of-the-art. So a lot will be determined by the patient."
Dr. Michael S. Okun, national medical director of the National
Parkinson Foundation, praised the study, saying it opens the door
to "the hope for better symptomatic therapies in Parkinson's
disease, though patients should clearly understand their
limitations."
Okun added, "The gene therapy approach is clever and different.
This is an important study, particularly in terms of safety. It
will be important to follow these patients longer to look for
delayed benefits and potentially delayed risks."
More information
The U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
has more on
Parkinson's disease.